Finance Bill 2026: Penalties Introduced for Crypto-Asset Reporting Failures

Clause 87 of the Finance Bill, 2026 proposes to substitute section 446 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, introducing a specific penalty provision linked to reporting of crypto-asset transactions.

The substituted section 446 no longer deals with failure to get accounts audited. Instead, it provides a dedicated penalty regime to enforce compliance with section 509, which mandates furnishing of statements relating to transactions in crypto-assets by prescribed reporting entities.

The amendment takes effect from 1 April 2026, i.e., tax year 2026-27 onwards.

Background: Crypto-Asset Reporting Under Section 509

Section 509 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 imposes obligations on prescribed reporting entities to:

  • Furnish a statement of transactions in crypto-assets
  • In the prescribed form, manner, and time
  • Comply with due diligence requirements, and
  • Correct any inaccurate information when intimated

While section 509 created a reporting framework, the Act did not previously contain a dedicated penalty provision to address non-furnishing or persistent inaccuracies in such statements.

What Does Clause 87 Change?

Clause 87 substitutes section 446 in its entirety and introduces a two-tier penalty structure specifically for failures relating to crypto-asset transaction reporting under section 509. The new section 446 addresses:

  1. Failure to furnish the statement, and
  2. Furnishing inaccurate information and failure to correct it or comply with due diligence.

Penalty for Failure to Furnish Statement of Crypto-Asset Transactions

Statutory Provision

Under section 446(1) (as substituted):

  • Where a person required to furnish a statement under section 509(1)
  • Fails to furnish such statement within the time prescribed by rules,

the income-tax authority (as prescribed) may impose:

A penalty of ₹200 for every day during which the failure continues.

Implications

  • Introduces a continuing default-based penalty, encouraging timely filing
  • Penalty accrues day-by-day until compliance is achieved
  • Primarily impacts crypto exchanges, intermediaries, and other reporting entities

Penalty for Furnishing Inaccurate Information

Statutory Provision

Under section 446(2) (as substituted), a penalty of ₹50,000 may be imposed where a person required to furnish a statement under section 509(1):

  • Furnishes inaccurate information, and
  • Either:
    • Fails to correct such inaccuracy in accordance with section 509(4), or
    • Fails to comply with due diligence requirements under section 509(5).

Implications

  • Focuses on data accuracy and quality, not merely submission
  • Penalises persistent non-compliance after opportunity to rectify
  • Encourages robust internal controls and verification mechanisms

Nature and Scope of the Amendment

What the Amendment Does

  • Introduces a specific, self-contained penalty regime for crypto-asset reporting
  • Strengthens enforceability of section 509
  • Creates a deterrence against non-filing and careless reporting

What the Amendment Does Not Do

  • ❌ Does not impose penalties on individual crypto investors merely for trading
  • ❌ Does not criminalise crypto-asset transactions
  • ❌ Does not introduce new reporting obligations, it enforces existing ones

The amendment is compliance-oriented, not punitive beyond what is proportionate.

Who Is Primarily Affected?

  • Crypto exchanges and trading platforms
  • Custodial wallet providers
  • Other prescribed reporting entities notified under section 509

Individual taxpayers are affected indirectly, through improved accuracy and completeness of third-party reporting.

Effective Date

✔ Applicable from 1 April 2026. Applies to tax year 2026-27 and subsequent tax years.

Conclusion

Clause 87 of the Finance Bill, 2026 introduces a targeted and structured penalty framework to ensure compliance with crypto-asset transaction reporting requirements under section 509 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. By substituting section 446, the law now clearly prescribes consequences for delayed filing and persistent inaccuracies, strengthening the integrity of the crypto-asset reporting system.

The amendment represents a move towards disciplined information reporting in the digital asset ecosystem, without altering the substantive taxation of crypto-assets.

Related Posts:

Finance Bill, 2026: Union Budget 2026-27

Leave a Reply