Former GST Assistant Commissioner Gets 5-Year Jail Term in ₹12-Crore Bribery Case

In a major step toward accountability in public service, a special CBI court in Mumbai on Thursday (November 27, 2025) sentenced former GST Assistant Commissioner Ashok Nayak to five years of simple imprisonment and imposed a fine of ₹1 lakh in a high-profile bribery case registered in 2017.

Special Judge A V Kharkar made it clear that the misconduct committed by the accused “does not deserve any leniency,” stressing that every public servant is expected to perform their duties with honesty and integrity.

What the Case Was About

The case dates back to May 2017, when the Maharashtra Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) filed an FIR against Nayak, then serving as Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise & Customs. The complaint was lodged by a Mumbai-based bar and restaurant owner.

According to investigators:

  • Nayak demanded ₹12 crore from the businessman to “settle” a pending Enforcement Directorate (ED) inquiry.
  • He claimed he could leverage influence through a “senior bureaucrat” in the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to resolve the matter.
  • The officer allegedly pressured the complainant to pay 25–30% upfront (around ₹1.25 crore) within 1-2 days to avoid immediate ED arrest.
  • During negotiations, the demand was reduced to ₹10 crore.

Acting quickly, the ACB set up a trap on May 6, 2017, and Nayak was caught red-handed accepting the first instalment of ₹1.25 crore at his World Trade Centre office in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai.

Court’s Observations & Sentence

Nayak was convicted under Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC. Key highlights from the judgment include:

  • Strong evidence such as audio recordings and witness testimonies proved the demand for and acceptance of bribe money beyond reasonable doubt.
  • The court dismissed the defence’s request for leniency, noting Nayak’s past departmental penalties for similar acts.
  • Considering his age and cardiac issues, the court awarded simple imprisonment instead of rigorous imprisonment.

Special Judge A.V. Kharkar emphasized:

“The accused was a public servant and expected to devote his sincere attention towards his duties and perform it honestly… his act does not deserve any leniency.”

Why This Verdict Matters

This judgment reinforces the ongoing struggle against corruption within India’s tax and excise administration. The fact that an officer attempted to misuse the authority of the Prime Minister’s Office to extort crores highlights the severity of the misconduct and the betrayal of public trust.

The sentencing, delivered eight years after the trap, also showcases how the justice system, despite delays, can reach strong and decisive outcomes when evidence is solid.

Sources: Hindustan Times, The Indian Express, PTI, Times of India (reports dated November 27–28, 2025)

Tags:

One Response

  1. Anil Gupta

Leave a Reply